Holiday Rentals In Sonoma County: Supervisors Increase Cap

By Jeremy Hay, Bay Town Information Foundation SONOMA COUNTY, CA — Sonoma County supervisors on…

By Jeremy Hay, Bay Town Information Foundation

SONOMA COUNTY, CA — Sonoma County supervisors on Tuesday attained an settlement to extend for 3 months a cap on the number of vacation rentals in the county, a much cry from the 22 months staff members experienced sought. The unanimous vote stored the ceiling for the variety of trip rentals at 1,948 — the number of current permitted rentals — until mid-December.

The cap was adopted as an urgency ordinance that the board authorized Aug. 18 and that was to expire Oct. 2. The cap applies only to the unincorporated regions of the county, not its cities.

The Tuesday vote came about through a last-moment compromise that overcame the objections of 3 supervisors who were leaning against extending the cap at all.

Under the proposal fashioned by Supervisor Lynda Hopkins, the countywide restrict expires in December but at that time, county employees is to present a new proposal addressing only these places of the county most impacted by vacation rentals, the Russian River and Sonoma Valley.

The board on Tuesday at initially appeared poised to reject completely on a 3-2 vote the proposal to increase the cap.

“I want to aid you solve your difficulties within just all those distinct regions in your district but I never think a moratorium and the extension of a moratorium is the answer,” Supervisor David Rabbitt reported to Hopkins and Supervisor Susan Gorin, the board chairperson, whose district includes Sonoma Valley.

But just one last try by Hopkins — whose district incorporates the Russian River communities of Guerneville, Forestville, Monte Rio and Rio Nido — to trend a quick-phrase option received out.

“This just isn’t a black and white challenge,” she mentioned, responding to problems that the proposed cap could hurt the area economy, especially the tourism sector, was unfair to person house homeowners, and was a blanket alternative to a issue impacting only particular sections of the county. Both of those she and Gorin — whose Sonoma Valley district has the most getaway rentals in the county —acknowledged that a countywide cap was an imperfect tool.

“We do have a difficulty,” Hopkins claimed. “How do we go about approaching that issue in a a lot more specific way.”

She explained the lower Russian River as staying at the time a location of holiday cabins and vacationing San Francisco people but that has progressed into a yr-spherical “reside and get the job done” community that is starting off to “erode” below the tension of getaway rentals.

Gorin said, “I am not essentially supportive of this tactic, in no way have been, it is really an urgency system to deal with some of the challenges … I would be looking for a way to set a cap on individuals locations that we have recognized briefly.”

A Saturday social gathering at a family vacation rental in Gorin’s district led to gunfire that strike five households no a person was hurt. But the other supervisors manufactured apparent they wouldn’t be on board with the countywide cap for much longer.

“Coming back, I’m not going to be voting to continue to keep my district in a moratorium. So it gives the time for you all to appear back with proposals for your districts, and I respect that,” explained Supervisor James Gore.

Supervisor Shirlee Zane stated, “I will compromise on this proposal until finally December but not earlier then.”

In proposing the extension, county personnel pointed to components like a 2015 report that concluded that the rapidly growing range of family vacation rentals was slicing into the housing available for doing work people. Towards that backdrop, due to the fact the 2017 Tubbs and Nuns fires, which wrecked 5,334 households in Sonoma County, the variety of vacation rental permits issued in the unincorporated regions of the county by itself has risen by almost 45 %, from 1,335 to 1,904, staff explained.

But Zane rejected the premise that getaway rentals are notably impacting the housing market.

“Probably a report we did 6 a long time back reveals it can be obtaining an influence. But the largest effects is that we all have to phase up and put on our political britches and say we require affordable housing, and we require to stand up to NIMBYs,” she reported.

The 2015 report produced 4 recommendations to regulate and minimize the impact of family vacation rentals. A person was to prohibit extra rentals in city areas and need permits that require approval in rural spots.

The other 3 recommendations have been to allocate lodging taxes to very affordable housing systems, waive certain development charges, and ensure web pages that are ideal for housing are created all set for growth.

Under the ordinance, when a family vacation rental allow expires other purposes are allowed until finally the cap is reached again.


Copyright© 2020 by Bay City Information, Inc.— Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express prepared consent of Bay Metropolis News, Inc. is prohibited.